On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 14:15, Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote: > Should we get rid of sato? I'm reluctant as we don't have a good > replacement plan. Ideas have been proposed but nobody is willing to > step up, propose and maintain something. We have a number of areas > where we could spend time and there are probably higher priority > issues. How much work is gtk4 in sato? No idea to be honest.
Here's mine. It may not be good, but I believe it's still ok. And good may simply never show up, while gtk3/sato/x11 continue their slow but steady slide into obsolescence. - core-image-weston[-*] replaces core-image-sato[-*] as the 'workhorse' of the test matrix. The patchset for that is ready, with additional provisions to ensure sato/x11 continues to get testing. - epiphany is added to core-image-weston, and visible in its app launcher. - as many tests for the browser and web engine are run at runtime as possible Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#174112): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/174112 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/95377611/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
