Op 22 feb. 2012, om 22:39 heeft Andreas Müller het volgende geschreven: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:15 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Applying patch gcc45-no-add-needed.patch >>>> patching file gcc/config/alpha/elf.h >>>> patching file gcc/config/ia64/linux.h >>>> patching file gcc/config/linux.h >>>> Hunk #1 succeeded at 89 (offset -12 lines). >>>> patching file gcc/config/rs6000/sysv4.h >>>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 908. >>>> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file gcc/config/rs6000/sysv4.h >>>> Patch gcc45-no-add-needed.patch does not apply (enforce with -f) >>>> ERROR: Function failed: patch_do_patch >>>> ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: >>>> /home/Superandy/tmp/oe-core-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.5-r45+svnr181733/temp/log.do_patch.5367 >>>> NOTE: package gcc-cross-initial-4.5-r45+svnr181733: task do_patch: Failed >>>> ERROR: Task 2829 >>>> (/home/Superandy/data/oe-core/sources/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.5.bb, >>>> do_patch) failed with exit code '1' >>>> >>>> git log does not help me much - what goes wrong? >>> >>> Which actual patch is it failing on? Is there a conflict between >>> oe-core and meta-oe patch set against gcc? >> >> gcc45-no-add-needed.patch is the patch in question. I dont see >> anything wrong with it. >> Can you do bitbake -ccleanall gcc-cross-initial and redo bitbake >> gcc-cross-initial -cpatch ? >> > FYI: I removed the line which came in by the commits I mentioned above > > should_apply[vardepsexclude] += "PN" > > in openembedded-core/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-common.inc > > and build from scratch works without issues.
I received reports of the same problem and I handed your fix to them, I'm waiting to hear back. regards, Koen _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
