On Mon, 2022-12-12 at 16:56 +0800, Yu, Mingli wrote: > From: Mingli Yu <[email protected]> > > We can define the layers need to check in a file and skip the yocto > compliance check if the layer is't defined in the file. > > Signed-off-by: Mingli Yu <[email protected]> > --- > scripts/yocto-check-layer | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
I'm afraid I don't really like this idea. What use case are you solving? Ideally we want people to be obtaining compatible status for their layers so making it easier to hide or skip layers isn't one of our objectives. It also isn't clear from just looking at the patch if this could be used to bypass some of the layer dependency checks and some of the requirements of yocto compatible status too. We ideally want people to be able to reproduce the test status for a given layer without any special configuration file. So unless someone can explain why this is absolutely necessary, I don't really want to merge anything like it. Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#174773): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/174773 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/95617459/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
