From: Alex Stewart <[email protected]> Some distributions (NI LinuxRT) provide both busybox-lsof and full-featured lsof implementations. When users install the full-featured lsof package, the full-binary fails to replace the bbox-binary in PATH, because `lsof` contains no update-alternatives logic.
Inherit the update-alternatives bbclass and assert that the full-featured lsof package has higher priority than the busybox implementation. Co-Authored-By: Kyle Roeschley <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Stewart <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit e2893fa692a6e91eee09fc04c8c03fe27c718a58) Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <[email protected]> --- meta/recipes-extended/lsof/lsof_4.94.0.bb | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/lsof/lsof_4.94.0.bb b/meta/recipes-extended/lsof/lsof_4.94.0.bb index c2b8bc839b..62f42975af 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-extended/lsof/lsof_4.94.0.bb +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/lsof/lsof_4.94.0.bb @@ -19,6 +19,15 @@ SRCREV = "005e014e1abdadb2493d8b3ce87b37a2c0a2351d" S = "${WORKDIR}/git" + +inherit update-alternatives + +ALTERNATIVE_${PN} = "lsof" +ALTERNATIVE_LINK_NAME[lsof] = "${sbindir}/lsof" +# Make our priority higher than busybox +ALTERNATIVE_PRIORITY = "100" + + export LSOF_INCLUDE = "${STAGING_INCDIR}" do_configure () { -- 2.25.1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#174797): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/174797 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/95748303/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
