Should we just move these patches to rust-source and apply them for everyone who consumes it?
On Thu, 29 Dec 2022, 19:09 Khem Raj, <[email protected]> wrote: > The same rust getrandom patch is needed for cargo on target as well > as it uses the same crate > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]> > --- > meta/recipes-devtools/rust/cargo_1.66.0.bb | 5 ++++- > .../rust/{rust => files}/getrandom-open64.patch | 0 > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > rename meta/recipes-devtools/rust/{rust => files}/getrandom-open64.patch > (100%) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/cargo_1.66.0.bb > b/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/cargo_1.66.0.bb > index 37e0123ee3..f45f8f1e12 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/cargo_1.66.0.bb > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/cargo_1.66.0.bb > @@ -14,7 +14,10 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = " \ > require rust-source.inc > require rust-snapshot.inc > > -SRC_URI:append:class-target = " > file://crossbeam_atomic.patch;patchdir=${RUSTSRC}" > +SRC_URI:append:class-target = "\ > + file://crossbeam_atomic.patch;patchdir=${RUSTSRC} \ > + file://getrandom-open64.patch;patchdir=${RUSTSRC} \ > > +" > > # Used by crossbeam_atomic.patch > export TARGET_VENDOR > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust/getrandom-open64.patch > b/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/files/getrandom-open64.patch > similarity index 100% > rename from meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust/getrandom-open64.patch > rename to meta/recipes-devtools/rust/files/getrandom-open64.patch > -- > 2.39.0 > > > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#175127): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/175127 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/95942095/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
