You should send respective patches to both mailing lists at the same time, noting that one is dependent on the other.
Alex On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 at 11:44, Christian Eggers <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wednesday, 21 December 2022, 03:59:07 CET, [email protected] wrote: > > From: Wang Mingyu <[email protected]> > > > > 0001-The-std-lib-unary-binary_function-base-classes-are-d.patch > > removed since it's included in 1.81.0 > > > > Signed-off-by: Wang Mingyu <[email protected]> > > --- > > .../{boost-1.80.0.inc => boost-1.81.0.inc} | 2 +- > > ...y-binary_function-base-classes-are-d.patch | 34 ------------------- > > .../{boost_1.80.0.bb => boost_1.81.0.bb} | 1 - > > 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 36 deletions(-) > > rename meta/recipes-support/boost/{boost-1.80.0.inc => boost-1.81.0.inc} > > (90%) > > delete mode 100644 > > meta/recipes-support/boost/boost/0001-The-std-lib-unary-binary_function-base-classes-are-d.patch > > rename meta/recipes-support/boost/{boost_1.80.0.bb => boost_1.81.0.bb} > > (75%) > > > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/boost/boost-1.80.0.inc > > b/meta/recipes-support/boost/boost-1.81.0.inc > > similarity index 90% > > rename from meta/recipes-support/boost/boost-1.80.0.inc > > rename to meta/recipes-support/boost/boost-1.81.0.inc > > index 3ee82eb9b2..291796c736 100644 > > --- a/meta/recipes-support/boost/boost-1.80.0.inc > > +++ b/meta/recipes-support/boost/boost-1.81.0.inc > > @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ BOOST_MAJ = "${@"_".join(d.getVar("PV").split(".")[0:2])}" > > BOOST_P = "boost_${BOOST_VER}" > > > > SRC_URI = > > "https://boostorg.jfrog.io/artifactory/main/release/${PV}/source/${BOOST_P}.tar.bz2"; > > -SRC_URI[sha256sum] = > > "1e19565d82e43bc59209a168f5ac899d3ba471d55c7610c677d4ccf2c9c500c0" > > +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = > > "71feeed900fbccca04a3b4f2f84a7c217186f28a940ed8b7ed4725986baf99fa" > > > > UPSTREAM_CHECK_URI = "http://www.boost.org/users/download/"; > > UPSTREAM_CHECK_REGEX = "release/(?P<pver>.*)/source/" > > diff --git > > a/meta/recipes-support/boost/boost/0001-The-std-lib-unary-binary_function-base-classes-are-d.patch > > > > b/meta/recipes-support/boost/boost/0001-The-std-lib-unary-binary_function-base-classes-are-d.patch > > deleted file mode 100644 > > index 49603348ee..0000000000 > > --- > > a/meta/recipes-support/boost/boost/0001-The-std-lib-unary-binary_function-base-classes-are-d.patch > > +++ /dev/null > > @@ -1,34 +0,0 @@ > > -From f9b55f5a1fab85bf73c95e6372779d6f50f75e84 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > -From: jzmaddock <[email protected]> > > -Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 18:26:07 +0100 > > -Subject: [PATCH] The std lib unary/binary_function base classes are > > - deprecated/removed from libcpp15. Fixes > > - https://github.com/boostorg/container_hash/issues/24. > > - > > -Upstream-Status: Backport > > [https://github.com/boostorg/config/pull/440/commits/f0af4a9184457939b89110795ae2d293582c5f66] > > -Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]> > > ---- > > - boost/config/stdlib/libcpp.hpp | 9 +++++++++ > > - 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > - > > -diff --git a/boost/config/stdlib/libcpp.hpp > > b/boost/config/stdlib/libcpp.hpp > > -index bc8536ead..0e9f2445e 100644 > > ---- a/boost/config/stdlib/libcpp.hpp > > -+++ b/boost/config/stdlib/libcpp.hpp > > -@@ -168,4 +168,13 @@ > > - # define BOOST_NO_CXX14_HDR_SHARED_MUTEX > > - #endif > > - > > -+#if _LIBCPP_VERSION >= 15000 > > -+// > > -+// Unary function is now deprecated in C++11 and later: > > -+// > > -+#if __cplusplus >= 201103L > > -+#define BOOST_NO_CXX98_FUNCTION_BASE > > -+#endif > > -+#endif > > -+ > > - // --- end --- > > --- > > -2.37.2 > > - > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/boost/boost_1.80.0.bb > > b/meta/recipes-support/boost/boost_1.81.0.bb > > similarity index 75% > > rename from meta/recipes-support/boost/boost_1.80.0.bb > > rename to meta/recipes-support/boost/boost_1.81.0.bb > > index c34ab7d703..4b580d078b 100644 > > --- a/meta/recipes-support/boost/boost_1.80.0.bb > > +++ b/meta/recipes-support/boost/boost_1.81.0.bb > > @@ -4,5 +4,4 @@ require boost.inc > > SRC_URI += "file://boost-math-disable-pch-for-gcc.patch \ > > > > file://0001-Don-t-set-up-arch-instruction-set-flags-we-do-that-o.patch \ > > file://0001-dont-setup-compiler-flags-m32-m64.patch \ > > - > > file://0001-The-std-lib-unary-binary_function-base-classes-are-d.patch \ > > " > > > > There is a new library (boost-url) in boost-1.81.0. So "url" should be added > to BOOST_LIBS. > Unfortunately this causes a conflict (sorry, I don't remember which type) > with the standalone > boost-url recipe in meta-openembedded (that recipe should be obsolete now). > > What is the correct procedure in this case? I guess that it's not possible to > atomically remove > the boost-url recipe from meta-openembedded and add "url" to BOOST_LIBS. > > regards > Christian > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#175385): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/175385 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/95800004/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
