lgtm

On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 11:17 PM BINDU <bindudaniel1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Virendra Thakur <virend...@kpit.com>
>
> Backport of gcc upstream commit 2b2d97fc545635a0f6aa9c9ee3b017394bc494bf
> to gcc release 9.5.0. This fix is available to all release-branches
> except releases/gcc-9 because upstream do not support gcc-9 now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Virendra Thakur <virend...@kpit.com>
> ---
>  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-9.5.inc         |  1 +
>  ...nsistent-noexcept-specific-for-valar.patch | 44 +++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 
> meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-9.5/0002-libstdc-Fix-inconsistent-noexcept-specific-for-valar.patch
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-9.5.inc 
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-9.5.inc
> index 6a0a892b10..ec28246bf3 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-9.5.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-9.5.inc
> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ SRC_URI = "\
>             
> file://0037-CVE-2019-14250-Check-zero-value-in-simple_object_elf.patch \
>             
> file://0038-gentypes-genmodes-Do-not-use-__LINE__-for-maintainin.patch \
>             
> file://0039-process_alt_operands-Don-t-match-user-defined-regs-o.patch \
> +           
> file://0002-libstdc-Fix-inconsistent-noexcept-specific-for-valar.patch \
>  "
>  S = "${TMPDIR}/work-shared/gcc-${PV}-${PR}/gcc-${PV}"
>  SRC_URI[sha256sum] = 
> "27769f64ef1d4cd5e2be8682c0c93f9887983e6cfd1a927ce5a0a2915a95cf8f"
> diff --git 
> a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-9.5/0002-libstdc-Fix-inconsistent-noexcept-specific-for-valar.patch
>  
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-9.5/0002-libstdc-Fix-inconsistent-noexcept-specific-for-valar.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..506064bfc2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ 
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-9.5/0002-libstdc-Fix-inconsistent-noexcept-specific-for-valar.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
> +From 60d966708d7cf105dccf128d2b7a38b0b2580a1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> +From: Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com>
> +Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 21:42:20 +0000
> +Subject: [PATCH] libstdc++: Fix inconsistent noexcept-specific for valarray
> + begin/end
> +
> +These declarations should be noexcept after I added it to the
> +definitions in <valarray>.
> +
> +libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
> +
> +       * include/bits/range_access.h (begin(valarray), end(valarray)):
> +       Add noexcept.
> +
> +(cherry picked from commit 2b2d97fc545635a0f6aa9c9ee3b017394bc494bf)
> +
> +Upstream-Status: Backport 
> [https://github.com/hkaelber/gcc/commit/2b2d97fc545635a0f6aa9c9ee3b017394bc494bf]
> +Signed-off-by: Virendra Thakur <virend...@kpit.com>
> +
> +---
> + libstdc++-v3/include/bits/range_access.h | 8 ++++----
> + 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> +
> +diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/range_access.h 
> b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/range_access.h
> +index 3d99ea92027..4736e75fda1 100644
> +--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/range_access.h
> ++++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/range_access.h
> +@@ -101,10 +101,10 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
> +
> +   template<typename _Tp> class valarray;
> +   // These overloads must be declared for cbegin and cend to use them.
> +-  template<typename _Tp> _Tp* begin(valarray<_Tp>&);
> +-  template<typename _Tp> const _Tp* begin(const valarray<_Tp>&);
> +-  template<typename _Tp> _Tp* end(valarray<_Tp>&);
> +-  template<typename _Tp> const _Tp* end(const valarray<_Tp>&);
> ++  template<typename _Tp> _Tp* begin(valarray<_Tp>&) noexcept;
> ++  template<typename _Tp> const _Tp* begin(const valarray<_Tp>&) noexcept;
> ++  template<typename _Tp> _Tp* end(valarray<_Tp>&) noexcept;
> ++  template<typename _Tp> const _Tp* end(const valarray<_Tp>&) noexcept;
> +
> +   /**
> +    *  @brief  Return an iterator pointing to the first element of
> +--
> +2.25.1
> \ No newline at end of file
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
> 
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#177872): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/177872
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/97309533/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to