Yes, will revert that patch and backport the correct one. Thanks vivek
On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 10:47 AM DC <[email protected]> wrote: > The patches submitted to > dunfell -> > https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/177768 > Kirkstone -> > https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/177767 > <https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/177767> > > Still exhibits O(n^2) behaviour upon testing with applications and fonts > and in worst cases Harfbuzz is not printing anything. > Upon closer examination, looks to me that a wrong fix is pushed for the > issue. > > The patch [ > https://github.com/harfbuzz/harfbuzz/commit/85be877925ddbf34f74a1229f3ca1716bb6170dc > ] is known to causes erroneous results and regression already reverted by > Behdad as a developer of Harfbuzz in the commit [ > https://github.com/harfbuzz/harfbuzz/commit/661050b4659ee490dfe622821bc7fde7d1c40510 > ]. > > (ref-> > https://github.com/harfbuzz/harfbuzz/commit/85be877925ddbf34f74a1229f3ca1716bb6170dc#commitcomment-101326711 > ) > > The new fix was already introduced ( > https://github.com/harfbuzz/harfbuzz/commit/85be877925ddbf34f74a1229f3ca1716bb6170dc#commitcomment-101335712) > and needs to be backported properly. > > It doesn't look correct to patch Harfbuzz with code already reverted. > > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#178057): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/178057 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/97419449/21656 Mute #kirkstone:https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/mutehashtag/kirkstone Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
