On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 6:38 PM Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 at 18:28, Martin Jansa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 6:26 PM Alexander Kanavin < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Tests in distrodata that contact upstream servers had to be disabled > >> because it's not possible to tell what is a real failure, and what is > >> a transient upstream issue (with expired certificates or other network > >> issues). To ensure upstream version checks don't regress, I run them > >> manually every now and then. > > > > > > Thanks, can you confirm that git-submodule-test is currently failing for > you (and probably was for long time) and > > that binutils is often reporting failure? > > I run the check (basically 'devtool check-upgrade-status' with a > manual review of what it prints) without meta-selftest included into > the build, > but I can try that if you want. > No need, "without meta-selftest included" explains why you haven't fixed it already. I was reading "I run them manually every now and then." as that you're triggering some special job on AB manually, but with meta-selftest and through OESelftestTestCase.test_checkpkg. binutils is flaky, yes. The server is contaced mutliple times for > various flavours of it, and some kind of silly rate limiting kicks in. > If you run a standaline 'devtool check-upgrade-status binutils', it > will work. > Yes, that's what I was seeing yesterday as well, but then it was failing quite reliably in OESelftestTestCase.test_checkpkg until I've added some debug into it. Cheers,
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#178463): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/178463 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/97578950/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
