On Tue, 28 Mar 2023 at 00:28, Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote: > > And probably split maintainers.inc into respective recipes, come to > > think of it. It'll hopefully draw more attention to how many do not > > have a maintainer. > > I think this is probably more obvious all in one file.
I'm not sure about that. I feel no one ever looks at that file, until we tell them to fix an entry in it. But people do look at (and make changes to) recipes all the time. The first step towards solving any non-technical problem is making it visible and well-known. Anyway, that's orthogonal to shifting these tests out of selftests (and fixing patchtest), and we can address these issues separately. I'll try to get to the patchtest. Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#179211): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/179211 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/97865034/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
