On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 11:49 AM Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, 2023-05-14 at 06:31 -1000, Steve Sakoman wrote: > > From: Richard Purdie <[email protected]> > > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <[email protected]> > > (cherry picked from commit 4ba74f61f38827d82586cf9c993a4b27065f5c6f) > > Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <[email protected]> > > --- > > meta/recipes-core/glib-networking/glib-networking/eagain.patch | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/glib-networking/glib-networking/eagain.patch > > b/meta/recipes-core/glib-networking/glib-networking/eagain.patch > > index 6dfbb2736c..ac6592ffef 100644 > > --- a/meta/recipes-core/glib-networking/glib-networking/eagain.patch > > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/glib-networking/glib-networking/eagain.patch > > @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ Index: glib-networking-2.74.0/tls/tests/connection.c > > MIN (TEST_DATA_LENGTH / 2, > > TEST_DATA_LENGTH - test->nread), > > NULL, &error); > > + > > -+ if (error == G_IO_STATUS_AGAIN) > > ++ if (g_error_matches (error, G_IO_ERROR, G_IO_ERROR_BUSY)) > > + continue; > > + > > g_assert_no_error (error); > > I'm not sure this is working yet, I suspect we've seen the error in > builds with the patch applied :(
FWIW, I used to get the error often without the patch. I haven't had the error since taking this patch. Certainly not proof it is working 100% of the time, but certainly much improved. Steve
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#181219): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/181219 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/98887184/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
