Dear James,
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2012, 01:49 +0000 schrieb James Limbouris: > > thank you for sending an improved version of the patch. > > > ... > > > > as Khem and you discussed, it should be useful for upstream [1]. Maybe > > you can add more context [2][3], so upstream can better judge if they > > want it. > > > ... > > [1] > > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2012-March/018554.html > > [2] > > http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/autoconf-2.67/html_node/Generic-Programs.html > > [3] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-ncurses/2011-11/msg00011.html > This issue has already been patched for gtk+, and is marked Upstream: > inappropriate there. > However, I couldn't find any mention of AC_CHECK_TOOLS in the Gnome bugzilla, > so I have submitted bug reports for both gdk-pixbuf and gtk+. > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671515 > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671516 awesome! Thanks a lot! Could you add these links to the patch and resend. I guess it will go in then. Thanks, Paul
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
