> On 17 May 2023, at 17:32, Bruce Ashfield via lists.openembedded.org > <bruce.ashfield=gmail....@lists.openembedded.org> wrote: > > I'm not sure if you saw the old threads on this, but we went through this > binding in detail in february: > > See the series from TrevorW: > > [PATCH v3 1/4] dtc: version bump and add python wrapper > > The pypi releases of libfdt bindings are not kept in sync with the dtc > releases and rarely update. Not that they change a lot, but that is > still the case. > > The suggestion for the bindings is the same, they'd be better of built > from dtc, versus using pypi. > > There may be some issues remaining with the build, as Trevor hasn't > updated his series in a while now.
Agreed - that series needs to be resurrected as it’s the canonical source of the bindings. Ross
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#181527): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/181527 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/98944002/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
