Hi Steve,

I still didn't get shell access to those builders, feel free to merge it as
is.

Hopefully other people don't have so outdated build infrastructure :).

Regards,

On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 8:50 PM Steve Sakoman <st...@sakoman.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 10:34 AM Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > It might be useful to delay backporting this for a bit longer (and
> I'll soon confirm if 3.10 was already affected or not).
> >
> > I can confirm that 3.10 is also affected.
> >
> > I did build with
> https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/commit/?h=stable/kirkstone-nut&id=75e3870ea124321b81f856c4e5170c891f0bd050
> and mkfs.ext4 didn't segfault. With uninative 3.10 from
> https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/commit/?h=stable/kirkstone-nut&id=680eecc3ae09ea5585e46ff0e67f7c6704221806
> it segfaults again.
> >
> > I haven't reproduced the gdk-pixbuf-native issue with
> buildtools-extended 4.0.6 with kirkstone yet, so that one might be only
> with nanbield, but mkfs.ext4 segfaults seem related to uninative for sure.
> Will debug more when I get access.
>
> Have you learned anything more on this issue?  I've continued testing
> mickledore both locally and on the autobuilder and I'm not seeing any
> failures :-(
>
> Steve
>
> > On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 9:14 PM Steve Sakoman <st...@sakoman.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 7:39 AM Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > it looks like this change is causing mkfs.ext4 to segfault on some
> builders.
> >> >
> >> > I'm seeing it on ubuntu-18.04 (I know it's unsupported now). It might
> be related to older docker or libseccomp2 there, because there is similar
> issue with gdk-pixbuf-native which fails when buildtools-extended is used
> together with this and might be related to
> https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/43595 because when I try very similar
> 18.04 ubuntu image on my gentoo host I cannot reproduce neither the
> gdk-pixbuf-native failure nor the mkfs.ext4 segfaults.
> >> >
> >> > I'm trying to get access to some of the affected boxes to find out
> which version docker/libseccomp2 is used there and to double check that
> this is root cause for these failures (now I can only confirm that it
> started in Nanbield when this uninative upgrade was merged and now I've
> reproduced the same with kirkstone-nut with the same uninative upgrade.
> >> >
> >> > It might be useful to delay backporting this for a bit longer (and
> I'll soon confirm if 3.10 was already affected or not).
> >>
> >> Agreed, I'm struggling with kirkstone too, so will delay taking the
> >> uninative update until we learn more.
> >>
> >> Thanks for the review!
> >>
> >> Steve
> >>
> >> > On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 4:22 AM Steve Sakoman <st...@sakoman.com>
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> From: Michael Halstead <mhalst...@linuxfoundation.org>
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Michael Halstead <mhalst...@linuxfoundation.org>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org>
> >> >> (cherry picked from commit f87becb69e02bdf055dffb633ed4f6d36b36f7a7)
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <st...@sakoman.com>
> >> >> ---
> >> >>  meta/conf/distro/include/yocto-uninative.inc | 8 ++++----
> >> >>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >> >>
> >> >> diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/yocto-uninative.inc
> b/meta/conf/distro/include/yocto-uninative.inc
> >> >> index f3c05b7e20..ad4816a1f3 100644
> >> >> --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/yocto-uninative.inc
> >> >> +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/yocto-uninative.inc
> >> >> @@ -7,9 +7,9 @@
> >> >>  #
> >> >>
> >> >>  UNINATIVE_MAXGLIBCVERSION = "2.37"
> >> >> -UNINATIVE_VERSION = "3.10"
> >> >> +UNINATIVE_VERSION = "4.0"
> >> >>
> >> >>  UNINATIVE_URL ?= "
> http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/releases/uninative/${UNINATIVE_VERSION}/
> "
> >> >> -UNINATIVE_CHECKSUM[aarch64] ?=
> "b11f7dff0ff5e3c971f22e89a105efb0f8d2006fd71d1ea3e5da771e416b0e01"
> >> >> -UNINATIVE_CHECKSUM[i686] ?=
> "ad7daa7fca7693ca07eea5279f830333530171d357759b380954a25254edd8dd"
> >> >> -UNINATIVE_CHECKSUM[x86_64] ?=
> "ce8ff7e3247da312fbf84008f415bc1b4d113ac9fe4ec91581e4a20cd8b475d3"
> >> >> +UNINATIVE_CHECKSUM[aarch64] ?=
> "7baa8418a302df52e00916193b0a04f318356d9d2670c9a2bce3e966efefd738"
> >> >> +UNINATIVE_CHECKSUM[i686] ?=
> "83114d36883d43a521e280742b9849bf85d039b2f83d8e21d480659babe75ee8"
> >> >> +UNINATIVE_CHECKSUM[x86_64] ?=
> "fd75b2a1a67a10f6b7d65afb7d0f3e71a63b0038e428f34dfe420bb37716558a"
> >> >> --
> >> >> 2.34.1
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> 
> >> >>
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#182519): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/182519
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/99279066/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to