From: Ross Burton <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <[email protected]>
---
 .../erofs-utils/erofs-utils_1.6.bb            |   5 +-
 ...-don-t-allocate-read-too-large-exten.patch | 126 ++++++++++++++++++
 ...-block-insane-long-paths-when-extrac.patch |  80 +++++++++++
 3 files changed, 210 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 
meta/recipes-devtools/erofs-utils/files/0001-erofs-utils-fsck-don-t-allocate-read-too-large-exten.patch
 create mode 100644 
meta/recipes-devtools/erofs-utils/files/0002-erofs-utils-fsck-block-insane-long-paths-when-extrac.patch

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/erofs-utils/erofs-utils_1.6.bb 
b/meta/recipes-devtools/erofs-utils/erofs-utils_1.6.bb
index 43643e07bbc..5a89e4b8ee6 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/erofs-utils/erofs-utils_1.6.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/erofs-utils/erofs-utils_1.6.bb
@@ -6,7 +6,10 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = 
"file://COPYING;md5=73001d804ea1e3d84365f652242cca20"
 HOMEPAGE = 
"https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xiang/erofs-utils.git/tree/README";
 
 SRCREV = "21710612d35cd952490959bfa6ea9fe87aaa52dd"
-SRC_URI = 
"git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xiang/erofs-utils.git;branch=master;protocol=https"
+SRC_URI = 
"git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xiang/erofs-utils.git;branch=master;protocol=https
 \
+           
file://0001-erofs-utils-fsck-don-t-allocate-read-too-large-exten.patch \
+           
file://0002-erofs-utils-fsck-block-insane-long-paths-when-extrac.patch \
+"
 
 UPSTREAM_CHECK_GITTAGREGEX = "v(?P<pver>(\d+(\.\d+)+))"
 
diff --git 
a/meta/recipes-devtools/erofs-utils/files/0001-erofs-utils-fsck-don-t-allocate-read-too-large-exten.patch
 
b/meta/recipes-devtools/erofs-utils/files/0001-erofs-utils-fsck-don-t-allocate-read-too-large-exten.patch
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..52f475dc424
--- /dev/null
+++ 
b/meta/recipes-devtools/erofs-utils/files/0001-erofs-utils-fsck-don-t-allocate-read-too-large-exten.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
+From c769805c79d5acede65d96e5786aa5ebb46c01e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Gao Xiang <[email protected]>
+Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 11:05:19 +0800
+Subject: [PATCH 1/2] erofs-utils: fsck: don't allocate/read too large extents
+
+Since some crafted EROFS filesystem images could have insane large
+extents, which causes unexpected bahaviors when extracting data.
+
+Fix it by extracting large extents with a buffer of a reasonable
+maximum size limit and reading multiple times instead.
+
+Note that only `--extract` option is impacted.
+
+CVE: CVE-2023-33552
+Closes: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-33552
+Reported-by: Chaoming Yang <[email protected]>
+Fixes: 412c8f908132 ("erofs-utils: fsck: add --extract=X support to extract to 
path X")
+Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <[email protected]>
+Link: 
https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
+
+Upstream-Status: Backport
+Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <[email protected]>
+---
+ fsck/main.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
+ 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/fsck/main.c b/fsck/main.c
+index 6b42252..6689ad8 100644
+--- a/fsck/main.c
++++ b/fsck/main.c
+@@ -392,6 +392,8 @@ static int erofs_verify_inode_data(struct erofs_inode 
*inode, int outfd)
+       }
+ 
+       while (pos < inode->i_size) {
++              unsigned int alloc_rawsize;
++
+               map.m_la = pos;
+               if (compressed)
+                       ret = z_erofs_map_blocks_iter(inode, &map,
+@@ -420,10 +422,28 @@ static int erofs_verify_inode_data(struct erofs_inode 
*inode, int outfd)
+               if (!(map.m_flags & EROFS_MAP_MAPPED) || !fsckcfg.check_decomp)
+                       continue;
+ 
+-              if (map.m_plen > raw_size) {
+-                      raw_size = map.m_plen;
+-                      raw = realloc(raw, raw_size);
+-                      BUG_ON(!raw);
++              if (map.m_plen > Z_EROFS_PCLUSTER_MAX_SIZE) {
++                      if (compressed) {
++                              erofs_err("invalid pcluster size %" PRIu64 " @ 
offset %" PRIu64 " of nid %" PRIu64,
++                                        map.m_plen, map.m_la,
++                                        inode->nid | 0ULL);
++                              ret = -EFSCORRUPTED;
++                              goto out;
++                      }
++                      alloc_rawsize = Z_EROFS_PCLUSTER_MAX_SIZE;
++              } else {
++                      alloc_rawsize = map.m_plen;
++              }
++
++              if (alloc_rawsize > raw_size) {
++                      char *newraw = realloc(raw, alloc_rawsize);
++
++                      if (!newraw) {
++                              ret = -ENOMEM;
++                              goto out;
++                      }
++                      raw = newraw;
++                      raw_size = alloc_rawsize;
+               }
+ 
+               if (compressed) {
+@@ -434,18 +454,27 @@ static int erofs_verify_inode_data(struct erofs_inode 
*inode, int outfd)
+                       }
+                       ret = z_erofs_read_one_data(inode, &map, raw, buffer,
+                                                   0, map.m_llen, false);
++                      if (ret)
++                              goto out;
++
++                      if (outfd >= 0 && write(outfd, buffer, map.m_llen) < 0)
++                              goto fail_eio;
+               } else {
+-                      ret = erofs_read_one_data(&map, raw, 0, map.m_plen);
+-              }
+-              if (ret)
+-                      goto out;
++                      u64 p = 0;
+ 
+-              if (outfd >= 0 && write(outfd, compressed ? buffer : raw,
+-                                      map.m_llen) < 0) {
+-                      erofs_err("I/O error occurred when verifying data chunk 
@ nid %llu",
+-                                inode->nid | 0ULL);
+-                      ret = -EIO;
+-                      goto out;
++                      do {
++                              u64 count = min_t(u64, alloc_rawsize,
++                                                map.m_llen);
++
++                              ret = erofs_read_one_data(&map, raw, p, count);
++                              if (ret)
++                                      goto out;
++
++                              if (outfd >= 0 && write(outfd, raw, count) < 0)
++                                      goto fail_eio;
++                              map.m_llen -= count;
++                              p += count;
++                      } while (map.m_llen);
+               }
+       }
+ 
+@@ -460,6 +489,12 @@ out:
+       if (buffer)
+               free(buffer);
+       return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
++
++fail_eio:
++      erofs_err("I/O error occurred when verifying data chunk @ nid %llu",
++                inode->nid | 0ULL);
++      ret = -EIO;
++      goto out;
+ }
+ 
+ static inline int erofs_extract_dir(struct erofs_inode *inode)
+-- 
+2.34.1
+
diff --git 
a/meta/recipes-devtools/erofs-utils/files/0002-erofs-utils-fsck-block-insane-long-paths-when-extrac.patch
 
b/meta/recipes-devtools/erofs-utils/files/0002-erofs-utils-fsck-block-insane-long-paths-when-extrac.patch
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f2f1e343686
--- /dev/null
+++ 
b/meta/recipes-devtools/erofs-utils/files/0002-erofs-utils-fsck-block-insane-long-paths-when-extrac.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+From 6cebfbb79b1d5d8feb48801e1008eea5bfa8b599 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Gao Xiang <[email protected]>
+Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 13:52:56 +0800
+Subject: [PATCH 2/2] erofs-utils: fsck: block insane long paths when
+ extracting images
+
+Since some crafted EROFS filesystem images could have insane deep
+hierarchy (or may form directory loops) which triggers the
+PATH_MAX-sized path buffer OR stack overflow.
+
+Actually some crafted images cannot be deemed as real corrupted
+images but over-PATH_MAX paths are not something that we'd like to
+support for now.
+
+CVE: CVE-2023-33551
+Closes: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-33551
+Reported-by: Chaoming Yang <[email protected]>
+Fixes: f44043561491 ("erofs-utils: introduce fsck.erofs")
+Fixes: b11f84f593f9 ("erofs-utils: fsck: convert to use erofs_iterate_dir()")
+Fixes: 412c8f908132 ("erofs-utils: fsck: add --extract=X support to extract to 
path X")
+Signeo-off-by: Gao Xiang <[email protected]>
+Link: 
https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
+
+Upstream-Status: Backport
+Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <[email protected]>
+---
+ fsck/main.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
+ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/fsck/main.c b/fsck/main.c
+index 6689ad8..28d95ec 100644
+--- a/fsck/main.c
++++ b/fsck/main.c
+@@ -680,28 +680,35 @@ again:
+ static int erofsfsck_dirent_iter(struct erofs_dir_context *ctx)
+ {
+       int ret;
+-      size_t prev_pos = fsckcfg.extract_pos;
++      size_t prev_pos, curr_pos;
+ 
+       if (ctx->dot_dotdot)
+               return 0;
+ 
+-      if (fsckcfg.extract_path) {
+-              size_t curr_pos = prev_pos;
++      prev_pos = fsckcfg.extract_pos;
++      curr_pos = prev_pos;
++
++      if (prev_pos + ctx->de_namelen >= PATH_MAX) {
++              erofs_err("unable to fsck since the path is too long (%u)",
++                        curr_pos + ctx->de_namelen);
++              return -EOPNOTSUPP;
++      }
+ 
++      if (fsckcfg.extract_path) {
+               fsckcfg.extract_path[curr_pos++] = '/';
+               strncpy(fsckcfg.extract_path + curr_pos, ctx->dname,
+                       ctx->de_namelen);
+               curr_pos += ctx->de_namelen;
+               fsckcfg.extract_path[curr_pos] = '\0';
+-              fsckcfg.extract_pos = curr_pos;
++      } else {
++              curr_pos += ctx->de_namelen;
+       }
+-
++      fsckcfg.extract_pos = curr_pos;
+       ret = erofsfsck_check_inode(ctx->dir->nid, ctx->de_nid);
+ 
+-      if (fsckcfg.extract_path) {
++      if (fsckcfg.extract_path)
+               fsckcfg.extract_path[prev_pos] = '\0';
+-              fsckcfg.extract_pos = prev_pos;
+-      }
++      fsckcfg.extract_pos = prev_pos;
+       return ret;
+ }
+ 
+-- 
+2.34.1
+
-- 
2.34.1

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#183099): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/183099
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/99620669/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to