Richard Purdie <[email protected]> escreveu no dia quarta,
28/06/2023 à(s) 23:03:

> On Tue, 2023-06-27 at 10:16 +0000, Jose Quaresma wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Jose Quaresma <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >
> > v5: introduced in v5
> >
> >  meta/conf/distro/include/init-manager-systemd.inc | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/init-manager-systemd.inc
> b/meta/conf/distro/include/init-manager-systemd.inc
> > index 7867d90028..4989b93502 100644
> > --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/init-manager-systemd.inc
> > +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/init-manager-systemd.inc
> > @@ -5,3 +5,7 @@ VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_init_manager ??= "systemd"
> >  VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_initscripts ??= "systemd-compat-units"
> >  VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_login_manager ??= "shadow-base"
> >  VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_dev_manager ??= "systemd"
> > +
> > +# Use modules-load and modprobe config path distribution specific
> > +modulesloaddir ?= "${libdir}/modules-load.d"
> > +modprobedir ?= "${nonarch_base_libdir}/modprobe.d"
>
> Not everyone uses INIT_MANAGER and we don't really want these set in
> every recipe. I think this should be in the bbclass based upon some
> conditional, not here...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>

Sure, I will add it to the kernel-module-split bbclass conditioned to
systemd dsitro feature.
That is something I have been thinking about in the first versions.

-- 
Best regards,

José Quaresma
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#183610): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/183610
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/99806550/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to