On Wed, 2023-07-19 at 17:39 +0800, Yu, Mingli wrote: > On 7/19/23 17:24, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > > > > It is relevant, this is because of the dependency that this gets built > > > and fails. I've seen v4 but didn't have the time to test it yet. > > > > I've still not seen an answer to Ross' question or mine about why we > > can't just add a couple of dependencies and resolve things that way. > > Sorry for delayed respond! > > Have added qemu-common to make qemu as meta package to keep backward > compatibility. For user who install qemu rpm such as > qemu-7.2.0-r0.corei7_64.rpm, it still pull in all of things as before. > For user who cares the rpm size, can just choose to install the needed > qemu arch rpms such as qemu-system-aarch64-7.2.0-r0.corei7_64.rpm.
So why not just add: RRECOMMENDS:${PN} += "${PN}-system-all ${PN}-user-all" as I think we've then covered all the options we need? Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#184574): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/184574 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/100054994/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-