poky-tiny also fails:

https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/15/builds/7945/steps/12/logs/stdio

ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'glibc' (but 
/home/pokybuild/yocto-worker/poky-tiny/build/meta/recipes-core/packagefeeds/packagefeed-core-rpmtest.bb
 RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it)
glibc was skipped: incompatible with host i686-poky-linux-musl (not in 
COMPATIBLE_HOST)
NOTE: Runtime target 'glibc' is unbuildable, removing...
Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['glibc']
NOTE: Runtime target 'core-image-minimal' is unbuildable, removing...
Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['core-image-minimal', 
'packagefeed-core-rpmtest', 'glibc']
NOTE: Runtime target 'packagefeed-core-rpmtest' is unbuildable, removing...
Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['packagefeed-core-rpmtest', 
'glibc']
ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'packagefeed-core-rpmtest-dev' (but 
/home/pokybuild/yocto-worker/poky-tiny/build/meta/recipes-core/packagefeeds/packagefeed-core-rpmtest.bb
 RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it)
No eligible RPROVIDERs exist for 'packagefeed-core-rpmtest-dev'
NOTE: Runtime target 'packagefeed-core-rpmtest-dev' is unbuildable, removing...
Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['packagefeed-core-rpmtest-dev']


There are 6 oe-selftest failures, some are related, failing because
glibc is not available:

2023-08-19 17:40:07,485 - oe-selftest - INFO - RESULTS - 
baremetal.BaremetalTest.test_baremetal: FAILED (138.06s)
2023-08-19 17:40:07,485 - oe-selftest - INFO - RESULTS - 
distrodata.Distrodata.test_maintainers: FAILED (296.69s)
2023-08-19 17:40:07,485 - oe-selftest - INFO - RESULTS - 
imagefeatures.ImageFeatures.test_no_busybox_base_utils: FAILED (73.43s)
2023-08-19 17:40:07,485 - oe-selftest - INFO - RESULTS - 
multiconfig.MultiConfig.test_multiconfig: FAILED (131.44s)
2023-08-19 17:40:07,485 - oe-selftest - INFO - RESULTS - 
sstatetests.SStateHashSameSigs3.test_sstate_sametune_samesigs: FAILED (451.37s)
2023-08-19 17:40:07,485 - oe-selftest - INFO - RESULTS - 
sstatetests.SStateHashSameSigs4.test_sstate_noop_samesigs: FAILED (402.88s)


https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/86/builds/5621/steps/14/logs/stdio
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/127/builds/1938/steps/15/logs/stdio
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/79/builds/5633/steps/14/logs/stdio
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/87/builds/5655/steps/14/logs/stdio
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/80/builds/5579/steps/14/logs/stdio

And musl builds are also failing:

https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/64/builds/7633/steps/11/logs/stdio
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/45/builds/7655/steps/11/logs/stdio

I would think the series also causes this one but I have to confirm:

https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/44/builds/7672/steps/26/logs/stdio


On 19/08/2023 21:41:27+0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> This seems to cause a check-layer failure with meta-mingw:
> 
> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/39/builds/7667/steps/15/logs/stdio
> 
> AssertionError: Adding layer meta-mingw changed signatures.
> 2 signatures changed, initial differences (first hash before, second after):
>    packagefeed-core-rpmtest:do_packagefeed: 
> 8af5d3caf528efaeaa6469c7350fc323affe0ac7684e660b66a4b1d88a5bfb72 -> 
> 289f357ebf8cb3ef7670a2857d63640381ce812de7abe333d3fb7fb9abecbc29
>       bitbake-diffsigs --task packagefeed-core-rpmtest do_packagefeed 
> --signature 8af5d3caf528efaeaa6469c7350fc323affe0ac7684e660b66a4b1d88a5bfb72 
> 289f357ebf8cb3ef7670a2857d63640381ce812de7abe333d3fb7fb9abecbc29
>       NOTE: Starting bitbake server...
>       Taint (by forced/invalidated task) changed from 
> nostamp(uuid4):4a1257f0-298a-43ab-ac44-3808649481a1 to 
> nostamp(uuid4):f6871f5b-5790-4e6b-8079-db9e13bce98d
> 
> On 18/08/2023 12:44:49-0500, Charlie Johnston wrote:
> > Currently, the only way to build a feed natively in OE is to build all the 
> > desired packages
> > and then manually run bitbake package-index. This approach has a few 
> > drawbacks:
> > - The index creation methods ONLY work on the package deploy directory. If 
> > there are
> > packages that are not meant to be in the feed in the deploy directory, they 
> > will be included
> > in the package index. Also, multiple feeds cannot be built in one command 
> > due to this limitation.
> > - If a package feed depends on another package feed being side-by-side to 
> > it (that is, if
> > packages in Feed A depend on packages in Feed B and users of Feed B are 
> > required to use Feed A) a
> > user would have to manually remove duplicate packages from the deploy 
> > directory before making
> > Feed B's index.
> > 
> > To address this, this patch set creates a new packagefeed.bbclass that 
> > enables the creation of
> > feeds in a new deploy directory location for feeds. The patch set updates 
> > existing logic in the
> > package_manager class that was previously used to create a temporary feed 
> > when building a rootfs.
> > That logic is then used to create a feed and exclude any packages which 
> > might be included in any
> > provided side-by-side feeds. 
> > 
> > Note that currently the class does not make use of sstate. Since the 
> > individual packages are
> > cached, there did not seem to be anything to be gained from the extra 
> > effort required to cache the
> > feed. Caching the whole feed was not space efficient, and reworking package 
> > index creation to be
> > compatible with caching didn't seem worth the effort given that operation 
> > is fairly inexpensive.
> > 
> > I've tested this in oe-core by creating a few sample recipes and running 
> > with each combination of
> > the PACKAGE_CLASSES variable. The testimage cases for dnf were also updated 
> > to use the new packagefeed
> > creation mechanism and several images were run with testimage to confirm 
> > proper behavior.
> > 
> > Changes since v2:
> > - Added Summary to packagefeed-core-rpmtest.bb for recipe_qa.
> > - Updated do_recipe_qa to not require a maintainer on packagefeed-* recipes.
> > 
> > Changes since v1:
> > - Added example of implementation to bbclass comments.
> > - Updated testimage to use do_packagefeed for dnf tests and ran testimage 
> > on several images with and
> > without dnf tests.
> > 
> > Changes since RFC v2: 
> > - maps used to look up configurations for each package class have been 
> > updated to use nested dicts
> > to clarify what each item is.
> > - DEPLOY_DIR_FEED_<pkg type> definitions now include the ${PN} in the paths 
> > instead of relying on
> > adding it in the bbclass.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Charlie Johnston
> > 
> > 
> 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#186402): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/186402
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/100825496/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to