From: Max Krummenacher <[email protected]>
Hi
With commit d1d09bd4d7 ("bin_package.bbclass: Inhibit the default
dependencies") applied I'm getting a lot of these errors, i.e. qa
does miss libc and compiler provided libs:
ERROR: ti-img-rogue-umlibs-23.1.6404501-r2 do_package_qa: QA Issue:
/usr/lib/libusc.so.23.1.6404501 contained in package ti-img-rogue-umlibs
requires ld-linux-aarch64.so.1(GLIBC_2.17)(64bit), but no providers found in
RDEPENDS:ti-img-rogue-umlibs? [file-rdeps]
ERROR: ti-img-rogue-umlibs-23.1.6404501-r2 do_package_qa: QA Issue:
/usr/lib/libusc.so.23.1.6404501 contained in package ti-img-rogue-umlibs
requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.17)(64bit), but no providers found in
RDEPENDS:ti-img-rogue-umlibs? [file-rdeps]
ERROR: ti-img-rogue-umlibs-23.1.6404501-r2 do_package_qa: QA Issue:
/usr/lib/libufwriter.so.23.1.6404501 contained in package ti-img-rogue-umlibs
requires libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.14)(64bit), but no providers found in
RDEPENDS:ti-img-rogue-umlibs? [file-rdeps]
Reverting the commit makes the build pass, alternatively adding
to depends in the recipe which is using the bin_package class
fixes it too:
DEPENDS += " virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}compilerlibs virtual/libc"
I'd prefer reverting removing the default dependencies over fixing
each of the recipes which do use the bin_package class to actually
install binaries running in the target user space.
Any opinions?
Max
Max Krummenacher (1):
Revert "bin_package.bbclass: Inhibit the default dependencies"
meta/classes-recipe/bin_package.bbclass | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
--
2.35.3
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#186768):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/186768
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/100987453/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
