On 4 Sep 2023, at 15:12, Poonam Jadhav via lists.openembedded.org <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Poonam Jadhav <[email protected]> > > Remove 'PD' from 'LICENSE' for pixman recipe as it is not part of package. > > PD license comes as a part of the generic do_populate_license task > and not as a part of the actual package. It is nowhere in the source > code pixman - Pixman: The pixel-manipulation library for X and cairo. > (mirrored from https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pixman/pixman) > (cgit.freedesktop.org)
What do you mean do_populate_license task? I’m confused as to what you’re trying to say here. PD in the LICENSE field means “public domain”, and whilst there’s a bigger discussion about what “public domain” actually means in the real world, there is no doubt that pixman does in fact contain public domain code: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pixman/pixman/-/blob/master/test/utils/utils.c?ref_type=heads#L49 I say this patch is rejected. Ross
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#187188): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/187188 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/101148900/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
