Hi Yoann
On 19.10.23 at 10:00, Yoann Congal wrote:
Hi everyone,
We recently implemented a way to detect recipes for upstream code that contain
unit tests but does not implement ptests.
Those recipes make good candidates for increasing the ptests coverage.
This is implemented as a QA check. The check is disabled by default since it
generates a lot of warning at build.
In order to activate it (in local.conf for exemple) :
WARN_QA += "unimplemented-ptest"
The warnings looks like:
WARNING: time-1.9-r0 do_patch: QA Issue: time: autotools-based tests detected
[unimplemented-ptest]
I've generated the list for the unimplemented ptests for oe-core and for meta-openembedded:
329 unimplemented-ptests_oe-core.log:
https://gist.github.com/ycongal-smile/dd51b0e450a8f0083e9d5cc10eeeb060#file-unimplemented-ptests_oe-core-log
1080 unimplemented-ptests_meta-openembedded.log:
https://gist.github.com/ycongal-smile/dd51b0e450a8f0083e9d5cc10eeeb060#file-unimplemented-ptests_meta-openembedded-log
Thanks, indeed, I "own" recipes that were flagged :)
Maybe, you could find a way to notify the maintainers of such recipes,
as in the AUH upgrade status reports
(https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/188589 for
example).
Cheers
Michael.
--
Michael Opdenacker, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#189469):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/189469
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/102056219/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
