Mikko Rapeli <[email protected]> escreveu no dia quinta, 19/10/2023
à(s) 13:45:
> Hi,
>
> Could something like this work?
>
> --- a/meta/lib/oe/cve_check.py
> +++ b/meta/lib/oe/cve_check.py
> @@ -140,15 +140,14 @@ def get_patched_cves(d):
> return patched_cves
>
>
> -def get_cpe_ids(cve_product, version):
> +def get_cpe_ids(cve_product, cve_version):
> """
> Get list of CPE identifiers for the given product and version
> """
>
> - version = version.split("+git")[0]
> -
> cpe_ids = []
> for product in cve_product.split():
> + version = (d.getVar("CVE_VERSION_%s" % product) or
> cve_version).split("+git")[0]
>
Looks like your patch fixes the remaining issue
but don't know if it will be better to get the CVE_VERSION_ after
splitting the vendor from the product
Jose
> # CVE_PRODUCT in recipes may include vendor information for CPE
> identifiers. If not,
> # use wildcard for vendor.
> if ":" in product:
>
> Cheers,
>
> -Mikko
>
--
Best regards,
José Quaresma
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#189502):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/189502
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/101991269/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
