On Sat, 2023-11-11 at 08:20 -1000, Steve Sakoman wrote: > On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 8:08 AM Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 9:36 AM Richard Purdie > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 2023-11-11 at 05:03 -1000, Steve Sakoman wrote: > > > > We are seeing reproducibility issues where gcc-cross sometimes defaults > > > > to gnu11 and other times to gnu17. > > > > > > Why is gcc-cross doing that? It is supposed to be deterministic so we > > > really need to get to the bottom of this :/. > > > > I think the previous patch to enforce OE cflags is exposing this > > problem. > > No, the problem also exists without the previous patch. > > Richard suggested the backport as a potential solution, since it fixed > a repro issue in master. > > It turned out to not be a complete fix in dunfell, hence my second patch. > > I agree that it would be good to get to the bottom of the gcc > reproducibility problem. But until we do, this second patch will fix > the issue now and will do no harm once gcc is fixed since it is just > explicitly specifying what should be the gcc default.
I worry that if we merge that, we'll not spend the time needed to get to the bottom of the gcc issue :(. We don't know if the issue is there on master or not :/. Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#190438): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/190438 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/102526884/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
