Please see my latest comment in the bug, I don't think recipe_qa is to
blame, and it's not going to solve the issue.

Also, we do plan to actually register the outcome of recipe_qa into
sstate, that's why there's a placeholder for it

Alex

On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 at 16:19, Joshua Watt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> do_image_qa doens't produce any actual sstate output, so it should skip
> the sstate creation (similar to do_image_qa)
>
> [YOCTO #15289]
>
> Signed-off-by: Joshua Watt <[email protected]>
> ---
>  meta/classes-global/insane.bbclass | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/meta/classes-global/insane.bbclass 
> b/meta/classes-global/insane.bbclass
> index b78bb6f445d..5ce4216f3e0 100644
> --- a/meta/classes-global/insane.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes-global/insane.bbclass
> @@ -1556,6 +1556,7 @@ python do_recipe_qa() {
>  addtask do_recipe_qa before do_fetch do_package_qa do_build
>
>  SSTATETASKS += "do_recipe_qa"
> +SSTATE_SKIP_CREATION:task-recipe-qa = '1'
>  do_recipe_qa[sstate-inputdirs] = ""
>  do_recipe_qa[sstate-outputdirs] = ""
>  python do_recipe_qa_setscene () {
> --
> 2.34.1
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#191673): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/191673
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/102917477/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to