Richard Purdie <[email protected]> escreveu no dia quinta, 14/12/2023 à(s) 12:37:
> On Thu, 2023-12-14 at 13:34 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 at 13:30, Richard Purdie > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I think it would have a huge impact on the throughput of patches :( An > > > hour or two before the majority of the tests even start. > > > > Then the only remaining idea I have is adding more hardware. So that > > there's enough of it to rarely if ever have a situation where several > > builds run on the same worker. > > We are in the process of trying to work out which direction the > infrastructure will take as we are due a hardware refresh FWIW. > > I do still also think we need to take a look at the sstate > matches/mismatches... > I've thought a few times that having an argument on bitbake or something else to just execute the native targets would be very useful. With something like that we can split the builds for multiple machines in two steps building first the common part, In this first step we have some of the havey like clang-native rust-native rust-llvm-native. To conclude the first build would only run and build the native targets and the following builds will get all from the sstate. Jose > Cheers, > > Richard > > > > -- Best regards, José Quaresma
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#192367): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/192367 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/103146402/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
