Op 23 mrt. 2012, om 18:58 heeft Andreas Oberritter het volgende geschreven:
> On 23.03.2012 18:20, Koen Kooi wrote: >> >> Op 23 mrt. 2012, om 17:37 heeft Andreas Oberritter het volgende geschreven: >> >>> * Run depmod when the rootfs gets generated. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Oberritter <[email protected]> >>> --- >>> meta/classes/module.bbclass | 9 +++++---- >>> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/meta/classes/module.bbclass b/meta/classes/module.bbclass >>> index 53c16b7..e370b24 100644 >>> --- a/meta/classes/module.bbclass >>> +++ b/meta/classes/module.bbclass >>> @@ -37,15 +37,16 @@ module_do_install() { >>> } >>> >>> pkg_postinst_append () { >>> - if [ -n "$D" ]; then >>> - exit 1 >>> - fi >>> +if [ -n "$D" ]; then >>> + ${HOST_PREFIX}depmod -A -b $D -F >>> ${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR}/System.map-${KERNEL_VERSION} ${KERNEL_VERSION} >>> +else >>> depmod -a >>> update-modules || true >>> +fi >> >> That encodes host system paths into the package, which is not a good thing >> for tools like narcissus and hob. > > So should we remove the same lines from kernel.bbclass? I think so, I don't think we want to hand out binaries with scripts that say things like: foo-linux-depmod -F /storage/openembedded-is-a-poopyhead/something regards, Koen _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
