On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 07:26, Alexander Kanavin via
lists.openembedded.org <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I'm also curious about what osselot outputs that can't be done with a
> oe-core class directly? Is something missing in existing create-spdx
> classes? Here's for example what osselot provides for busybox, but I
> can't really make sense of it:
>
> https://github.com/Open-Source-Compliance/package-analysis/tree/main/analysed-packages/busybox/version-1.36.1

Okay, I've read the README file in that repo, and if i understood it
right, the process is:
- run fossology
- have a human inspect the output, and correct it on a file by file
basis (tremendous waste of time and limited developer resources even
when done the 'open source way' if you ask me but whatevs)
- place the corrected output into the above repository

Do you really really need the 'human corrected' part of all this? It
will never possibly cover all of the packages you need to ship and
match all their versions. If not, then maybe using and improving this
layer is a better way out?
https://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-spdxscanner/

Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#193634): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/193634
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/103730186/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to