On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 16:00, Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote:
> I know this feedback is long delayed so my apologies for that. > > I think I'm ok with the idea of this but I believe the naming isn't > quite right. > > "notes" does suggest something longer, so that is fine. My worry is > that in the metadata we have the SUMMARY and DESCRIPTION variables. The > former is the short one, the latter is the longer. > > If developers see: > > conf-notes.txt > conf-description.txt > > then they don't know which is the "short" one. > > If you however you have: > > conf-notes.txt > conf-summary.txt > > then I think that is much clearer? > > I think I'm therefore ok with the idea but I'd like to suggest using > "summary" instead of "description"... No problem. Peter suggested this previously as well, but I didn't think it's super important back then. Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#195746): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/195746 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/104073816/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
