On Mon, 2024-03-04 at 16:57 +0100, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
> Split out the two variables modulesloaddir and modprobedir from
> kernel-module-split.bbclass as they can be useful to other recipes than
> kernel module recipes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerst...@axis.com>
> ---
> meta/classes-recipe/kernel-module-dirs.bbclass | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 meta/classes-recipe/kernel-module-dirs.bbclass
>
> diff --git a/meta/classes-recipe/kernel-module-dirs.bbclass
> b/meta/classes-recipe/kernel-module-dirs.bbclass
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..eecc36ab52
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta/classes-recipe/kernel-module-dirs.bbclass
> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> +#
> +# Copyright OpenEmbedded Contributors
> +#
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> +#
> +
> +modulesloaddir ??= "${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'systemd',
> '${nonarch_libdir}', '${sysconfdir}', d)}/modules-load.d"
> +modprobedir ??= "${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'systemd',
> '${nonarch_base_libdir}', '${sysconfdir}', d)}/modprobe.d"
Absolutely not. We are not having yet more kernel classes just for two
variables.
There is probably a better way moving some definitions to a new conf
file for the kernel in general.
Cheers,
Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#196612):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/196612
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/104724883/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
