On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Chris Larson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 9:47 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Chris Larson <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> If you can explain why the override isn't overriding the default >>>> TUNE_PKGARCH (and it's intentional and not a bug), and we can consistently >>>> modify all of the elements... I'm happy to accept the changes to all of the >>>> tunings. >>> >>> See above. It's not an override. And plenty of files already specify >>> TUNE_PKGARCH_tune-<tune>, so I don't see how it'd be inconsistent to >>> do so for the defaults, personally. >> >> If no one else has complained so far it makes me believe they are not >> missing any TUNE_PKGARCH_tune-<tune> then. > > I don't understand the point you're attempting to make here.
Nevermind. Anyways, powerpc64 needs these too... -M _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
