On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 16:29 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:11:44PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 14:54 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 05:56:16PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 09:25 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > > > So, what is the subtle difference between += that we started with and =+ > > > that > > > you recommended at the end? I realize those are for append and prepend, > > > but > > > are they handled any different? Was your recommendation to use =+ at the > > > end, > > > instead of += that was used originally, based on some specifics? Thanks. > > > > I'm using += and =+ interchangeably. The contrast was with ?= which I > > argued against. Order in this case doesn't matter and I have no > > preference over += or =+, it simply doesn't matter. > > So I guess I'll spin everything one more time and drop the meta-intel > version and we'll just use += since that's the common one.
Sounds good. Sorry about the churn on this one, I thought it was clear += and =+ were equivalent in this context. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
