On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Koen Kooi <[email protected]> wrote: > Op 30 mrt. 2012, om 14:54 heeft Chris Larson het volgende geschreven:
>> I'm looking for questions, comments, testers, and in particular, >> thoughts on whether this will meet the needs of others with similar >> requirements (e.g. others shipping metadata with associated shared >> state). > > This is not strictly related to your patchset, but has anyone thought about > license based blacklisting of sstate? I can imagine that an autobuilder will > build everything, includes things like evil 3d drivers, but no want anyone to > access the sstate for those builds. Oh, that's a very good point. I hadn't considered that aspect. I haven't seen any implementation in that regard (actually, I have no idea how one goes about disabling sstate period -- it'd be nice if there was an easy variable rather than having to go deleting tasks and the like). -- Christopher Larson _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
