On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 09:49 GMT, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > I vaguely remember that at some point I ran 'bitbake -e recipe' > against qemux86 machine to study that question, and looked through all > related variables, and couldn't find anything better. But you're > welcome to try that as well.
For my specific example, I still believe it is more accurate to use HOST_ARCH and add "i686" to thirtytwo_bit_time_archs. This setup does not generate false positives and also works for qemux86. However, it will not necessarily work for other cases. To make it more general, I think some of the architectures from meta/lib/oe/elf.py can be added to thirtytwo_bit_time_archs. When comparing this with elf.py, I noticed some inconsistency. For example, both "arm" and "armb" are defined, while only "x86" is defined. Shouldn't the latter substituted with "i386", "i486", "i586" and "i686"? Also, shouldn't "mipsarcho32" correspond to the entries in elf.py? I'm unsure which ones exactly though. -- Emil Kronborg
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#199899): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/199899 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/106261505/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
