On Wed, 2024-05-29 at 12:08 +0200, Etienne Cordonnier via
lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> From: Etienne Cordonnier <[email protected]>
>
> The builtin command "sleep" was getting executed instead of the busybox
> binary.
> Hence "pidof sleep" was empty and the test was failing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Etienne Cordonnier <[email protected]>
> ---
> meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/systemd.py | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/systemd.py
> b/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/systemd.py
> index 5481e1d840..a2229848e7 100644
> --- a/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/systemd.py
> +++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/systemd.py
> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ class SystemdServiceTests(SystemdTest):
> Verify that call-stacks generated by systemd-coredump contain
> symbolicated call-stacks,
> extracted from the minidebuginfo metadata (.gnu_debugdata elf
> section).
> """
> - t_thread = threading.Thread(target=self.target.run, args=("ulimit -c
> unlimited && sleep 1000",))
> + t_thread = threading.Thread(target=self.target.run, args=("ulimit -c
> unlimited && /usr/bin/sleep 1000",))
> t_thread.start()
> time.sleep(1)
I get a bit nervous about hardcoding paths like "/usr/bin",
particularly in the context of some distros liking to move things
around. We may want to put a shutil.which("sleep") call in instead (and
an import shutil if needed)?
Cheers,
Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#200006):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/200006
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/106365956/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
