I believe this causes the following reproducibility failures:

https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/117/builds/4998/steps/13/logs/stdio

https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/repro-fail/oe-reproducible-20240627-3tyeozgn/packages/diff-html/



On 26/06/2024 14:05:00+0000, Sreejith Ravi wrote:
> Currently, the process_pkgconfig() only handles the "Requires" key
> field from the .pc file and ignores the "Requires.private" field while
> generating the dev dependency chain. This results in a broken dependency
> list and requires the installation of recommended packages to resolve
> the build dependencies when using the dev IPKs. This increases the
> hard disk space usage and download time and installs many unnecessary
> packages as part of the recommendations.
> 
> This patch ensures that the "Requires.private" field is also considered
> when creating the dependency list for the dev IPKs. With this, the dev
> IPK will have the proper dependencies listed, eliminating the need to
> install recommended packages to resolve the build time dependencies.
> 
> Example: usr/lib/pkgconfig/libical.pc
> ----------
> Libs: -L${libdir} -lical -licalss -licalvcal
> Libs.private: -lpthread
> Requires.private: icu-i18n
> ----------
> Depends field generated for libical-dev
> Depends: glib-2.0-dev, libical (= 3.0.7-r0)
> ------------
> 
> When trying to resolve the build time dependency with libical
> package using “-dev” ipk generated, it will throw the below error.
> -----------
> Package icu-i18n was not found in the pkg-config search path.
> Perhaps you should add the directory containing `icu-i18n.pc'
> to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
> Package 'icu-i18n', required by 'libical', not found
> -----------
> 
> This patch will fix the broken dependency list.
> 
> -------
> libical-dev depends field generated with this patch
> Depends: glib-2.0-dev, icu-dev, libical (= 3.0.7-r0)
> -------
> 
> Other examples of packages generated with broken dev dependency.
> 
> libflac-dev : https://packages.debian.org/sid/libflac-dev
> Without patch:
> Depends: flac (= 1.3.3-r0), libflac, libflac++
> with patch:
> Depends: flac (= 1.3.3-r0), libflac, libflac++, libogg-dev
> 
> libglib2.0-dev : https://packages.debian.org/buster/libglib2.0-dev
> without patch:
> Depends: libffi-dev, libglib-2.0-0 (= 1:2.62.6-r0), libpcre-dev
> with patch:
> Depends: libffi-dev, libglib-2.0-0 (= 1:2.62.6-r0), libpcre-dev,
>          util-linux-dev, zlib-dev
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sreejith Ravi <[email protected]>
> ---
>  meta/lib/oe/package.py | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/package.py b/meta/lib/oe/package.py
> index d1303f32bf..e6b46a0dc5 100644
> --- a/meta/lib/oe/package.py
> +++ b/meta/lib/oe/package.py
> @@ -1853,7 +1853,7 @@ def process_pkgconfig(pkgfiles, d):
>                          if m:
>                              hdr = m.group(1)
>                              exp = pd.expand(m.group(2))
> -                            if hdr == 'Requires':
> +                            if hdr == 'Requires' or hdr == 
> 'Requires.private':
>                                  pkgconfig_needed[pkg] += exp.replace(',', ' 
> ').split()
>                                  continue
>                          m = var_re.match(l)
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

> 
> 
> 


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#201198): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/201198
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/106889869/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to