On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 at 13:54, Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote:
> I appreciate it calls this "inherits" but this is actually a list of > any file included by the base recipe so any bbclass, .bb, or .inc file > that was included should be listed here. The True/False associated with > it is whether the file existed or not so that if it changed, we know to > reparse. This doesn't seem to be correct. I added + logger.info(tinfoil.cooker_data.inherits['/srv/work/alex/poky/meta/recipes-devtools/cmake/cmake_3.29.3.bb']) + logger.info(tinfoil.cooker_data.inherits['/srv/work/alex/poky/meta/recipes-devtools/cmake/cmake-native_3.29.3.bb']) to devtool to see how the data in that attribute looks like, and unfortunately it contains only .bbclass filenames and not .inc or any other dependent files: INFO: ['/srv/work/alex/poky/meta/classes-global/base.bbclass', '/srv/work/alex/poky/meta/classes-global/patch.bbclass', '/srv/work/alex/poky/meta/classes/terminal.bbclass', '/srv/work/alex/poky/meta/classes-global/staging.bbclass', '/srv/work/alex/poky/meta/classes-global/mirrors.bbclass', '/srv/work/alex/poky/meta/classes-global/utils.bbclass', '/srv/work/alex/poky/meta/classes-global/utility-tasks.bbclass', ... etc. - no cmake.inc mentioned anywhere. So assuming I didn't miss something, this either needs further bitbake/tinfoil extensions (even more work), or we can just write manual hints for lockstep upgrades into recipes (there's not that many of them so I'm leaning that way tbh). Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#201471): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/201471 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/106796297/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
