On 04/06/2012 04:12 AM, Cui, Dexuan wrote: > Cui, Dexuan wrote on 2012-04-06: >> Darren Hart wrote on 2012-04-06: >>> On 04/05/2012 09:41 PM, Cui, Dexuan wrote: >>> While I understand there are valid use cases, I think this is generally >>> contrary to workflow of the project. We build the OS, it runs on the >>> target. This is building a general purpose OS, and then having it build >>> itself out more. It doesn't feel like an embedded workflow. > BTW, my question might be simplified as: > If we strictly follow the rule the target OS shouldn't build itself out > more, why do we supply a recipe core-image-sato-sdk.bb that can > create an image with tools-sdk that includes development tools > like gcc? :-) > > Or, while we recommend the common embedded workflow, we > also somewhat support (or tolerate) the way "the target builds > itself out more"? >
Yup, agree. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
