On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 01:09:45PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]> > --- > .../gcc-4.6/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106876.patch | 109 ++++ > .../gcc-4.6/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106877.patch | 239 ++++++++ > .../gcc-4.6/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106878.patch | 69 +++ > .../gcc-4.6/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106879.patch | 643 > ++++++++++++++++++++ > .../gcc-4.6/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106882.patch | 53 ++ > .../gcc/gcc-4_6-branch-linaro-backports.inc | 5 + > .../recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-common-4.6.inc | 2 +- > 7 files changed, 1119 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 > toolchain-layer/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106876.patch > create mode 100644 > toolchain-layer/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106877.patch > create mode 100644 > toolchain-layer/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106878.patch > create mode 100644 > toolchain-layer/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106879.patch > create mode 100644 > toolchain-layer/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106882.patch
FWIW: this upgrade again triggered gcc-cross-initiall do_compile errors for incremental builds, it failed for 3 from 4 archs I'm building and each with different error. Reexecuting the same target again worked fine, so I still belive there is some sort of race condition with shared gcc workdir. I've uploaded cooker and do_compile logs here: http://build.shr-project.org/tests/jama/gcc-upgrade-issue/ Cheers, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
