On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 at 10:42, Chen Qi via lists.openembedded.org <[email protected]> wrote: > Please see my comments in your v1 patch. > I don't think we should add this PACKAGECONFIG, instead the util-linux's > check codes need to be improved.
If upstream provides an option to configure things in a release that we currently provide, then we should absolutely have a PACKAGECONFIG for it. And I think it should preserve existing default behaviour, e.g. enable the new API. Whether an upstream check can be improved is a separate question. First, it would be good to establish what it's actually doing, and why is it arriving at an incorrect decision for older kernels. Then we can see if there's something upstream could reasonably improve (I suspect not, as it's likely checking kernel headers from linux-libc-headers). Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#203492): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/203492 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/107977031/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
