On 2024-08-16 11:54 a.m., [email protected] wrote:
From: Yash Shinde<[email protected]>

Add some of the upsupported/failing tests to the exclude list
and ignore the failing unit tests.

Signed-off-by: Yash Shinde<[email protected]>
---
  meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/rust.py          | 34 +++++++++-
  .../rust/files/rust-oe-selftest.patch         | 64 ++++++++++++++++++-
  2 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/rust.py 
b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/rust.py
index 62ca762cd0..aa5814eccf 100644
--- a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/rust.py
+++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/rust.py
@@ -205,7 +205,39 @@ class RustSelfTestSystemEmulated(OESelftestTestCase, 
OEPTestResultTestCase):
                              'library/std/src/sync/rwlock/tests.rs',
                              'library/std/src/thread/tests.rs',
                              'library/test/src/stats/tests.rs',
-                            'tidyselftest'
+                            'tidyselftest',
+                            'compiler/rustc_span',
+                            'compiler/rustc_expand',
+                            'tests/ui/array-slice-vec',
+                            'tests/ui/associated-consts',
+                            'tests/ui/associated-types',
+                            'tests/ui/allocator',
+                            'tests/ui/abi/extern',
+                            'tests/codegen/non-terminate/infinite-loop-1.rs',
+                            'tests/codegen/coercions.rs',
+                            'tests/codegen/const_scalar_pair.rs',
+                            'tests/codegen/cold-call-declare-and-call.rs',
+                            'tests/codegen/issues',
+                            'tests/codegen/bool-cmp.rs',
+                            'tests/codegen/ascii-char.rs',
+                            'tests/codegen/frame-pointer.rs',
+                            'tests/codegen/common_prim_int_ptr.rs',
+                            'tests/codegen/default-requires-uwtable.rs',
+                            'tests/codegen/debug-accessibility/public-enum.rs',
+                            'tests/codegen/meta-filecheck/filecheck-flags.rs',
+                            'tests/codegen/float_math.rs',
+                            
'tests/codegen/debug-accessibility/tuple-fields.rs',
+                            'tests/codegen/consts.rs',
+                            'tests/codegen/enum/enum-bounds-check.rs',
+                            'tests/codegen/debug-alignment.rs',
+                            'tests/codegen/export-no-mangle.rs',
+                            'tests/codegen/fastcall-inreg.rs',
+                            
'tests/codegen/debuginfo-inline-callsite-location.rs',
+                            'tests/codegen/enum/enum-debug-tagged.rs',
+                            'tests/codegen/adjustments.rs',
+                            
'tests/codegen/macos/x86_64-macosx-deployment-target.rs',
+                            'tests/codegen/frame-pointer.rs',
+                            'tests/codegen/meta-filecheck/check-prefix.rs'
                          ]

Hi Yash,


There was a problem with a SDK test failing in 1.78 due to a linkage problem for rustc in the SDK.
You replied to the email saying:
  "This also resolves the "bitbake core-image-sato -c do_testsdk" error for cargo." but I don't see a patch or change that would resolve that problem. Can you explain briefly what the problem was and what you did to fix it for me and anyone who might be interested, please?


It seems that we now have just over 170 tests that we're skipping! Ugh!

Skipping tests is okay as a temporary work-around but once we have reached feature freeze next week on Aug 26, please start looking at why these tests are failing and try to fix the root cause so the tests can be re-enable.

$ rg -A 175 "exclude_list = " meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/rust.py


Where should you start, you might ask? Let's look at this list...

Oh, it's not sorted alphabetically as we agreed it should be!
Please fix that as a single commit now or as part of the next Rust update if that makes more sense for you
given that the feature freeze deadline is less than a week away.


BTW, you should be able to do this sorting within your editor (emacs can do it at least! ;-) ) but let's do it in the shell:

# cut on the ' delimiter:
$ rg -A 172 "exclude_list = " meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/rust.py | tail -172 | cut -d"'" -f2 | sort > /tmp/after

The 172 was determined manually.

Here's why you want the list sorted:

❯ uniq -c /tmp/after  | grep -v " 1 "
      2 compiler/rustc_interface/src/tests.rs
      2 library/std/src/thread/tests.rs
      2 library/test/src/stats/tests.rs
      2 tests/codegen/frame-pointer.rs
      2 tests/rustdoc-json
      2 tests/rustdoc-ui/doc-test-rustdoc-feature.rs
      2 tests/rustdoc-ui/no-run-flag.rs

so there are "only" 165 tests being skipped:

❯ uniq -c /tmp/after  | wc -l
165

I'm most concerned about the compiler and library/std tests but
we do need to work on understanding and hopefully fixing all the skipped tests.

Please take a look at say up to 5 tests, hopefully related, and work on fixing them as a group,
rather than trying to fix the entire list in one work item and one commit.

In future commits, please include a summary of the total number of tests that are being skipped and the total number that are being run so we can have a numerical indicator to track the rust
quality.


Oh, you had exact statistics in this poky commit:

commit c496b1eaf4b72ca979d47c37e73e44cd145fed1c
Author: Yash Shinde <[email protected]>
Date:   Sat Jul 29 03:00:21 2023

...

    * The tests that are passed and skipped are as follows-

    Target                  PASS                    SKIPPED

    ARM                     15507                    428
    ARM64                   15535                    400
    MIPS64                  15479                    456
    X86                     15528                    407
    X86-64                  15643                    292

so it looks like things have improved. Yay!

Do you know offhand if upstream Rust passes all tests for x86-64 and arm64 ?


I know that running these tests takes quite a long time so perhaps you can run the full testsuite for all targets once per YP release, on the final Rust update so that the results are in a commit log. Given that I've changed requirements, late in this release, if that's a problem then just send the update to 1.80.x in without the full set of all target statistics. Hopefully during the M4 bug fix cycle, you can fix some of the failing tests and provide statistics
for all targets,  including riscv64.


Please let me know what you think.

Thanks,

../Randy



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#203573): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/203573
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/107934730/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to