Hi Dmitry,
On 8/26/24 3:39 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
Add the firmware package for the ATH12K module.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <[email protected]>
---
.../linux-firmware/linux-firmware_20240312.bb | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-firmware/linux-firmware_20240312.bb
b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-firmware/linux-firmware_20240312.bb
index ff79bb9b33c6..53851b58fede 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-firmware/linux-firmware_20240312.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-firmware/linux-firmware_20240312.bb
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-amphion-vpu-license ${PN}-amphion-vpu \
${PN}-cnm-license ${PN}-cnm \
${PN}-atheros-license ${PN}-ar5523 ${PN}-ar9170 ${PN}-ath6k
${PN}-ath9k ${PN}-ath3k \
${PN}-carl9170 \
- ${PN}-ar3k-license ${PN}-ar3k ${PN}-ath10k-license ${PN}-ath10k
${PN}-ath11k ${PN}-qca \
+ ${PN}-ar3k-license ${PN}-ar3k ${PN}-ath10k-license ${PN}-ath10k
${PN}-ath11k ${PN}-ath12k ${PN}-qca \
\
${PN}-imx-sdma-license ${PN}-imx-sdma-imx6q ${PN}-imx-sdma-imx7d
\
\
@@ -487,6 +487,10 @@ FILES:${PN}-ath11k = " \
${nonarch_base_libdir}/firmware/ath11k \
"
+FILES:${PN}-ath12k = " \
+ ${nonarch_base_libdir}/firmware/ath12k \
+"
+
FILES:${PN}-qca = " \
${nonarch_base_libdir}/firmware/qca \
"
@@ -494,6 +498,7 @@ FILES:${PN}-qca = " \
RDEPENDS:${PN}-ar3k += "${PN}-ar3k-license ${PN}-atheros-license"
RDEPENDS:${PN}-ath10k += "${PN}-ath10k-license"
RDEPENDS:${PN}-ath11k += "${PN}-ath10k-license"
+RDEPENDS:${PN}-ath12k += "${PN}-ath10k-license"
I don't think this is appropriate for a release branch.
This would break existing users by moving the same file to a different
package. This is fine for the master branch, not release branches.
Since I cannot see any firmware/ath12k paths in any FILES aside from the
one added in this commit, I believe this directory was caught by the
catch-all linux-firmware mega-package? If that is the case, then to
still allow for backward compatibility, add the following:
RDEPENDS:${PN] += "${PN}-ath12k"
so that anyone installing/depending on linux-firmware package for this
directory will still have it after updating.
Cheers,
Quentin
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#203755):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/203755
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/108097108/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
