On Mon, 2 Sept 2024 at 16:15, Mikko Rapeli <[email protected]> wrote:
> So, this is a wic image format specific re-implementation of systemd ukify.py > script. > Calling not systemd ukify.py but objcopy directly. No control over kernel > command > line, but could possible be added with simple patch. I don't see how to hook > uki > signing into the mix with custom keys. Maybe a post processing step to the > .wic > image build. > > Since this version is merged I presume ukify.bbclass will be rejected. Not rejected per se; I would suggest that the existing wic implementation is rewritten to use the class (and hopefully becomes radically simpler and shorter)! It's fine to not be entirely backwards compatible; this is master, and we can break things. Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#204107): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/204107 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/108224526/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
