On 12/04/12 15:40, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 12 apr. 2012, om 16:38 heeft Andreas Oberritter het volgende geschreven:
On 12.04.2012 16:17, Jack Mitchell wrote:
On 12/04/12 15:08, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 12 apr. 2012, om 15:42 heeft [email protected] het volgende
geschreven:
From: Jack Mitchell<[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jack Mitchell<[email protected]>
---
meta-oe/recipes-support/jansson/jansson.inc | 8 ++++++++
meta-oe/recipes-support/jansson/jansson_2.3.bb | 4 ++++
^^^^^^^
I'll ask the standard question: why is this needed in oe-core?
regards,
Koen
I think there's a misunderstanding. Jack sent the patch to the wrong list.
Jack, patches for meta-oe should be submitted to
[email protected], with [meta-oe] as part of the
subject. See http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Mailing_lists.
Or read the dang README in the meta-oe layer, it's called README for a reason.
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Apologies. On further inspection it seems openembedded-devel was the
right place to send this patch. I have been under the impression that
oe-core was the new meta-oe & oe-core list and oe-dev was the
maintenance oe-classic list. I followed the Wiki page and made
alterations as I saw fit.
n.b. Koen, whilst I understand that the information was in the README
(which I have now read - thanks) I was following the Wiki and doing what
I believed to be right. It is not a requisite of my job to push patches
back, I was doing it out of support for the community and the drive to
help others. As it was my first ever OE Patch, and therefore my first
offence I don't believe the snarkyness was warranted.
Regards,
--
Jack Mitchell ([email protected])
Embedded Systems Engineer
http://www.embed.me.uk
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
