On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 07:08 +0200, Marta Rybczynska wrote: > To make a summary, this patch did not solve the issue on master, it > was the change of the database path that did.
Originally, I couldn't isolate the change to tell or not. Now, by changing the database path we've shown the issue is occurring on the branches without the patch. > Is this correct? And we still do not know what the cause is? So, > when we change the path on all branches, the issue is likely to come > back ? I think if we move the database operations to the local filesystem and out of DL_DIR, we're likely to stop seeing the issues. We know they're isolated to something about the older releases. > My problem with this patch is that it changes names of variables that > are in use. It should at least not fail silently for people who > decide to use a pinned database. > > Do you see another solution than renaming the _DLDIR_ version to the > old name? We either backport the patch as is and have the same functionality across the branches, or we do some special version of the patch for the LTS branches. In many ways I think it might be better to have things consistent rather than doing something special with all the confusion that can cause, even if people do have to actively adapt to the change. Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#206535): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/206535 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/107893246/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
