On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 at 05:00, Ross Burton <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 23 Oct 2024, at 18:39, Dan McGregor via lists.openembedded.org > <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is a somewhat difficult to hit, only my test machines that have > > the pam dev package installed show it. > > That’s exactly the reproducer with host contaimination problems. > > > +PACKAGECONFIG ??= "" > > +PACKAGECONFIG[pam] = "--with-pam=yes,--with-pam=no,libpam” > > We have a ‘pam’ DISTRO_FEATURE, should we just respect that as the default > PACKAGECONFIG using bb.utils.filter?
I'm not opposed, my original version of this patch did do that, but I also didn't test that pam actually worked, so I figured it was safer to just disable. > > Ross >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#206587): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/206587 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/109175489/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
