I have two small questions.
1) For the current systemd, what's the difference between the final
configure results with/without this option?
2) How could this help avoid reproducibility issues?
Regards,
Qi
On 11/10/24 21:28, Markus Volk wrote:
This might help avoid reproducibility issues
Signed-off-by: Markus Volk <[email protected]>
---
meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_256.7.bb | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_256.7.bb
b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_256.7.bb
index bf829c4931..159a0e25b8 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_256.7.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_256.7.bb
@@ -258,6 +258,7 @@ EXTRA_OEMESON += "-Dnobody-user=nobody \
-Dsystem-gid-max=999 \
-Dcreate-log-dirs=false \
${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'zeroconf',
'-Ddefault-mdns=no -Ddefault-llmnr=no', '', d)} \
+ --auto-features=disabled \
"
# Hardcode target binary paths to avoid using paths from sysroot or worse
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#206930):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/206930
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/109496557/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
