This reverts commit 0d14e99aa18ee38293df63d585fafc270a4538be. The patch removed logic required for correct handling of UBOOT_SUFFIX=img or UBOOT_SUFFIX=rom. We need to find a better way to handle the fix for [YOCTO #15649].
Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <[email protected]> --- meta/classes-recipe/uboot-sign.bbclass | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta/classes-recipe/uboot-sign.bbclass b/meta/classes-recipe/uboot-sign.bbclass index 7ee73b872a..a17be745ce 100644 --- a/meta/classes-recipe/uboot-sign.bbclass +++ b/meta/classes-recipe/uboot-sign.bbclass @@ -122,7 +122,13 @@ concat_dtb() { # If we're not using a signed u-boot fit, concatenate SPL w/o DTB & U-Boot DTB # with public key (otherwise U-Boot will be packaged by uboot_fitimage_assemble) if [ "${SPL_SIGN_ENABLE}" != "1" ] ; then - if [ -e "${UBOOT_NODTB_BINARY}" -a -e "${UBOOT_DTB_BINARY}" ]; then + if [ "x${UBOOT_SUFFIX}" = "ximg" -o "x${UBOOT_SUFFIX}" = "xrom" ] && \ + [ -e "${UBOOT_DTB_BINARY}" ]; then + oe_runmake EXT_DTB="${UBOOT_DTB_SIGNED}" ${UBOOT_MAKE_TARGET} + if [ -n "${binary}" ]; then + cp ${binary} ${UBOOT_BINARYNAME}-${type}.${UBOOT_SUFFIX} + fi + elif [ -e "${UBOOT_NODTB_BINARY}" -a -e "${UBOOT_DTB_BINARY}" ]; then if [ -n "${binary}" ]; then cat ${UBOOT_NODTB_BINARY} ${UBOOT_DTB_SIGNED} | tee ${binary} > \ ${UBOOT_BINARYNAME}-${type}.${UBOOT_SUFFIX} -- 2.17.1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#208441): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/208441 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/109965963/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
