On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 5:23 AM Richard Purdie <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, 2025-01-07 at 19:36 -0800, Khem Raj via lists.openembedded.org
> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  ...e-__HAVE_FLOAT128-for-Clang-and-use-.patch | 87 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc_2.41.bb         |  1 +
> >  2 files changed, 88 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644
> meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0001-Revert-x86-Define-__HAVE_FLOAT128-for-Clang-and-use-.patch
> >
> > diff --git
> a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0001-Revert-x86-Define-__HAVE_FLOAT128-for-Clang-and-use-.patch
> b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0001-Revert-x86-Define-__HAVE_FLOAT128-for-Clang-and-use-.patch
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000000..88823cb95bc
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++
> b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0001-Revert-x86-Define-__HAVE_FLOAT128-for-Clang-and-use-.patch
> > @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
> > +From b662179d7c679e423b8595e0509253688544a4fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > +From: Khem Raj <[email protected]>
> > +Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2024 18:59:26 -0800
> > +Subject: [PATCH] Revert "x86: Define __HAVE_FLOAT128 for Clang and use
> > + __builtin_*f128 code path"
> > +
> > +This reverts commit d773aff467840f5ed305e40c180466e90bd88183.
> > +
> > +Upstream-Status: Pending
> > +Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]>
> > +---
> > + sysdeps/x86/bits/floatn.h | 24 ++++++++----------------
> > + 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > +
>
> Why?
>
> Neither the commit message or the patch header have any information
> about why we need to do this...


I sent it by mistake local workaround for fixing mpfr with glibc 2.41

>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#209562): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/209562
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/110491482/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to