If the user has wanted to avoid complementary symbolic link creation by setting IMAGE_LINK_NAME value to empty string, then he/she needs to override the value of IMAGE_NAME name as well in order to avoid build breakage.
Mitigate the issue by placing the common segment in a separate variable which is referenced in default values of both IMAGE_NAME and IMAGE_LINK_NAME. Signed-off-by: Niko Mauno <[email protected]> --- meta/classes-recipe/image-artifact-names.bbclass | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/classes-recipe/image-artifact-names.bbclass b/meta/classes-recipe/image-artifact-names.bbclass index bc76ff0e16..8acdc16072 100644 --- a/meta/classes-recipe/image-artifact-names.bbclass +++ b/meta/classes-recipe/image-artifact-names.bbclass @@ -11,8 +11,9 @@ IMAGE_BASENAME ?= "${PN}" IMAGE_VERSION_SUFFIX ?= "-${DATETIME}" IMAGE_VERSION_SUFFIX[vardepsexclude] += "DATETIME SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH" -IMAGE_NAME ?= "${IMAGE_LINK_NAME}${IMAGE_VERSION_SUFFIX}" -IMAGE_LINK_NAME ?= "${IMAGE_BASENAME}${IMAGE_MACHINE_SUFFIX}${IMAGE_NAME_SUFFIX}" +IMAGE_NAME_BASE ?= "${IMAGE_BASENAME}${IMAGE_MACHINE_SUFFIX}${IMAGE_NAME_SUFFIX}" +IMAGE_NAME ?= "${IMAGE_NAME_BASE}${IMAGE_VERSION_SUFFIX}" +IMAGE_LINK_NAME ?= "${IMAGE_NAME_BASE}" # This needs to stay in sync with IMAGE_LINK_NAME, but with INITRAMFS_IMAGE instead of IMAGE_BASENAME # and without ${IMAGE_NAME_SUFFIX} which all initramfs images should set to empty -- 2.39.5
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#209804): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/209804 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/110609362/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
