2025. 01. 29. 12:04 keltezéssel, Alexander Kanavin írta:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 at 11:41, Zoltán Böszörményi <[email protected]> wrote:
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm-sequoia/rpm-sequoia_1.6.0.bb
Let's take the latest version right at this point, which is 1.7.0.
Ok.
+# The license line is taken verbatim from Fedora's specfile
+# with formatting differences for Yocto. (AND -> &, OR -> |)
+#
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/rust-rpm-sequoia/1.7.0/3.fc41/src/rust-rpm-sequoia-1.7.0-3.fc41.src.rpm
+LICENSE = "LGPL-2.0-or-later & Apache-2.0 & BSL-1.0 & MIT & Unicode-DFS-2016 & (Apache-2.0
| MIT) & (MIT | Apache-2.0 | Zlib) & (Unlicense | MIT)"
This is the original source, please replace the link:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-rpm-sequoia/blob/rawhide/f/rust-rpm-sequoia.spec
Thanks!
Does the target rpm-sequoia build without issues, or did you try only
the native?
I tried both. bitbake rpm-sequoia implicitly builds the native version
if rpm signing is enabled. :)
I checked that rpm is linked with the new library.
Otherwise, this looks really good, thanks for working through to a
much better recipe :)
Thanks. :)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#210373):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/210373
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/110875943/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
